Main display change to speedo?

[guest2360]

A couple of days ago I overtook a couple of cars who decided a big lump of grey with panniers shouldn't.  A bit more throttle and they were no more.  Just happened to look at the digi speed readout and was surprised to see a figure which I cannot repeat on here. I later checked the highest speed in the Nav V.  Exactly the same.  Could still be 1 or so mph in it though. 

[stayingupright]

A couple of days ago I overtook a couple of cars who decided a big lump of grey with panniers shouldn't.  A bit more throttle and they were no more.  Just happened to look at the digi speed readout and was surprised to see a figure which I cannot repeat on here. I later checked the highest speed in the Nav V.  Exactly the same.  Could still be 1 or so mph in it though.

You tease!!!


Spill the beans

[guest2360]

No.  I do not want to appear to be irresponsible but maybe for a second it was reading 112 kph.

[TJRL]

No. I do not want to appear to be irresponsible but maybe for a second it was reading 112 kph.

"KPH" Really?
In fact I think the 112 might not be the actual figure but it coverts spot on!

[stayingupright]

maybe for a second it was reading 112 kph.

Wow! ... Steady on there grandad.

[guest2360]

What's wrong with 67mph


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BeeJay]

Nothing unless it's in towm
lol

[heinze]

Think he may have inverted those numbers 211 kph or 131 mph,  easy speed to reach on overtake with the RT!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[guest2360]

No I didn't both the bike and the Nav showed the same speed. 131mph at my age!
That would be irresponsible for sure.

[BeeJay]

Irrisponsible, yes but QED
And I don't mean "quod erat demonstrandum"